自动化接入 · API / MCP EN

技术说明 · T1078

Valid Accounts

Adversaries may obtain and abuse credentials of existing accounts as a means of gaining Initial Access, Persistence, Privilege Escalation, or Defense Evasion. Compromised credentials may be used to bypass access controls placed on various resources on systems within the network and may even be used for persistent access to remote systems and externally available services, such as VPNs, Outlook Web Access, network devices, and remote desktop. Compromised credentials may also grant an adversary increased privilege to specific systems or access to restricted areas of the network. Adversaries may choose not to use malware or tools in conjunction with the legitimate access those credentials provide to make it harder to detect their presence. In some cases, adversaries may abuse inactive accounts: for example, those belonging to individuals who are no longer part of an organization. Using these accounts may allow the adversary to evade detection, as the original account user will not be present to identify any anomalous activity taking place on their account. The overlap of permissions for local, domain, and cloud accounts across a network of systems is of concern because the adversary may be able to pivot across accounts and systems to reach a high level of access (i.e., domain or enterprise administrator) to bypass access controls set within the enterprise.

ATT&CK T1078 platforms — 状态 有效 版本 20.1

Adversaries may obtain and abuse credentials of existing accounts as a means of gaining Initial Access, Persistence, Privilege Escalation, or Defense Evasion. Compromised credentials may be used to bypass access controls placed on various resources on systems within the network and may even be used for persistent access to remote systems and externally available services, such as VPNs, Outlook Web Access, network devices, and remote desktop.1 Compromised credentials may also grant an adversary increased privilege to specific systems or access to restricted areas of the network. Adversaries may choose not to use malware or tools in conjunction with the legitimate access those credentials provide to make it harder to detect their presence. In some cases, adversaries may abuse inactive accounts: for example, those belonging to individuals who are no longer part of an organization. Using these accounts may allow the adversary to evade detection, as the original account user will not be present to identify any anomalous activity taking place on their account.2 The overlap of permissions for local, domain, and cloud accounts across a network of systems is of concern because the adversary may be able to pivot across accounts and systems to reach a high level of access (i.e., domain or enterprise administrator) to bypass access controls set within the enterprise.3

  1. volexity_0day_sophos_FW
  2. CISA MFA PrintNightmare
  3. TechNet Credential Theft

使用该技术的组织

组织名称国家
grp_g0011PittyTiger—
grp_g0039SuckflyChina
grp_g0051FIN10—
grp_g1005POLONIUM—
grp_g0053FIN5—
grp_g0026APT18—
grp_g0122Silent Librarian—
grp_g0085FIN4—
grp_g1043BlackByte—
grp_g0117Fox Kitten—
grp_g1056TeamPCP—
grp_g1041Sea Turtle—
grp_g0032Lazarus GroupDPRK
grp_g1045Salt Typhoon—
grp_g0064APT33Iran
grp_g1024Akira—
grp_g1021Cinnamon TempestChina
grp_g0119Indrik SpiderRussia
grp_g0093GALLIUM—
grp_g0004Ke3chang—
grp_g0037FIN6—
grp_g1051Medusa Group—
grp_g1057ShinyHunters—
grp_g1015Scattered Spider—
grp_g0114ChimeraChina
grp_g1048UNC3886—
grp_g0008Carbanak—
grp_g0035DragonflyRussia
grp_g0001AxiomChina
grp_g0102Wizard SpiderRussia
grp_g1040Play—
grp_g0049OilRigIran
grp_g1004LAPSUS$—
grp_g1055VOID MANTICORE—
grp_g1058The Gentlemen—
grp_g0061FIN8—
grp_g1033Star Blizzard—
grp_g1017Volt Typhoon—
grp_g0091Silence—
grp_g0065LeviathanChina
grp_g0046FIN7—
grp_g1032INC Ransom—
grp_g0087APT39—
grp_g0096APT41China
grp_g0045menuPass—
grp_g0007APT28Russia
grp_g0016APT29Russia
grp_g0027Threat Group-3390China
grp_g0034Sandworm TeamRussia

断言

尚无指向该技术的公开断言。

记录自动入库·未人工复核;置信度与有效期按引用读取。